09

Early last month January in the new year, three major global institutions released reports on growth prospects for 2026. On January 8, the United Nations (UN) published World Economic Situation and Prospects 2026 (WESP). A week later, on January 16, the world’s most influential private-sector-led body, the World Economic Forum (WEF), released its Chief Economists’ Outlook 2026. On January 23, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) issued a revised World Economic Outlook 2026, updating its growth estimates for India.

The UN described global growth of 2.8% in 2025 as moderate and still below pre-pandemic levels. Its forecast for 2026 is even lower, at below 2.7%. Global trade tensions, financial pressures, and policy uncertainty were cited as major constraints, although South Asia is expected to remain a strong growth engine with an average growth rate of 5.6%. India’s growth was estimated at an impressive 7.4% in 2025, though it may slow to 6.6% in 2026, if India’s trade talks get further delayed.  The UN attributed India’s performance to strong domestic consumption, large government investment, and leadership in digital technologies and artificial intelligence.

The WEF report described India’s economic outlook for 2026 as “cautiously bright” compared to last year. Although rising U.S. tariffs pose risks, India is working to diversify export markets and stimulate domestic demand. While 53% of WEF experts expect global conditions to weaken in 2026, they still anticipate a significant improvement in India’s growth. Key themes for 2026 include increased investment in artificial intelligence, fiscal consolidation, and trade restructuring.

The IMF, which released its World Economic Outlook 2026 on January 19, issued an updated assessment on January 23, revising India’s growth estimate for FY 2025–26 upward to 7.3%. The upgrade reflects stronger-than-expected momentum in the third and fourth quarters, supported by robust domestic demand and investment. In the global context, the IMF described India as a “key growth engine for the world,” outpacing other G20 economies. For FY 2026–27, growth is projected at 6.4%, reflecting trade and geopolitical uncertainties.

India: A “Goldilocks Economy”

The current usage of the term “Goldilocks” comes from the British fairy tale “Goldilocks and the Three Bears”, in which the young child finds the baby bear’s porridge “just right”—neither too hot nor too cold. Similarly, the Indian economy is growing at a sustainable pace without excessive inflationary pressures. High growth combined with manageable inflation has made India a pillar of stability. Rapid advances in artificial intelligence and technology investments are expected to boost productivity within the next two years. India remains the fastest-growing economy among the G20.

Despite global trade barriers—particularly U.S. tariffs imposed on imports from much of the world during the tariff war launched by President Trump, during his 2024 election campaign—India’s domestic demand, digital infrastructure, and structural reforms are expected to sustain growth.

By mid-January 2026, India’s foreign exchange reserves stood at USD 687.19 billion, sufficient to cover 11 months of imports. However, the rupee had been steadily weakening since January 2025, when President Trump announced reciprocal tariffs on imports effective April 1—termed “Liberation Day”—along with an additional penal tariff of 25% on India for discouraging imports of Russian crude and refined petroleum products. These measures destabilized India’s external sector, with heavy net outflows of short- term capital triggered sharp fluctuations in the rupee–dollar exchange rate. On December 3, 2025, the rupee fell for the first time to a historic intraday low of ₹90 per US dollar. The latest Economic Survey 2025–26, released on January 29, 2026, records that India’s financial markets have faced bouts of volatility due to global trade tensions and cautious foreign portfolio investor (FPI) flows, as well.

RBI Intervention

The volatility in the rupee–dollar rate reflected declining investor confidence throughout the second half of 2025. India faced net foreign portfolio investment outflows and significant long-term capital withdrawals, prompting intervention by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to stabilize the currency. In previous Fiscal Year (FY) 2024–25, the RBI recorded net US dollar sales of USD 34.5 billion. Although the Indian Prime Minister was invited to the White House in February 2025 to discuss future political and trade relations—one of the first four world leaders to do so—and the meeting ended on a cordial note, the reciprocal tariffs announced from April 1 2025 sharply altered market sentiment. Between April-December 2025 alone, the just released Survey points out net outflows of $3.9 billion reversed the inflows seen in the previous year.

In the first half of current FY 2025–26, RBI intervention costs rose to USD 43 billion, followed by another USD 23 billion during September–November, amounting to USD 66 billion in just eight months. Data for the remaining four months of FY 2026 are not yet available. These interventions led to a decline in foreign exchange reserves, following the post-COVID surge in export earnings ($607 billion in 2021, $563 billion in 2022, $595 billion in 2023, $617 billion in 2024, and $558 billion in 2025).

These setbacks undoubtedly rattled the economy. Yet, India has not only endured but continued to perform strongly. It is widely hailed not just as the fastest-growing economy but also as a global growth engine. The IMF chief has acknowledged India’s contribution of nearly 20% to global growth. The latest Economic Survey says India’s robust services exports (+6.5% in FY26 so far) and merchandise export growth (+2.4%) provided stability .

“Do Not Judge a Nation by Its Currency Movements”

In an interview with NDTV on January 14, the RBI Governor emphasized that currency fluctuations alone do not define economic strength. India’s trade deficit in 2025 stood at only 2% of GDP. Compared with Brazil, South Africa, and Mexico, India’s macroeconomic indicators remain strong and resilient, even though markets remain anxious. The primary source of uncertainty has been the prolonged delay in finalizing a U.S.–India trade agreement, with negotiations dragging on for more than a year since President Trump assumed office in January 2025.

Preliminary findings from an ongoing study of volatility across six emerging economies—Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia and South Africa—show that India’s volatility is the second highest (5%), next only to South Africa (5.8%); (monthly standard deviation as a percentage of the average exchange rate), compared with Brazil’s 4.3%, More importantly, the competitiveness of Indian exports is reflected in the real exchange rate, which adjusts nominal rates for inflation differentials. RBI policy brought inflation below the 4% target, reaching a record low of 0.25% in October 2025 (down from 4.31% in January 2025), before rising to 0.71% in November and 1.33% in December. These levels reflect strong macroeconomic management.

Though fundamentals remain sound, Professor Sachs told in his address to an Indian audience, RBI’s intervention is just a palliative solution, but what is needed is a curative or necessary and permanent remedy. And that is implementation of structural reforms to sustain economic growth, which is heavy investment in education and human capital. Of course, in the immediate term, India has to restore and  sustain overseas investor confidence, by whatever it takes. .

No wonder the government sent its largest-ever delegation to the WEF Annual Meeting 2026 in Davos (January 19–23) to attract global investors and reinforce confidence in India’s economy. This time,

neither the Prime Minister nor the Finance Minister nor the RBI Governor attended. Instead, the delegation comprised Union ministers heading key portfolios, chief ministers of major states, and leading corporate executives. It was a well-coordinated effort to showcase India’s technological capabilities, industrial strength, and governance frameworks at both the central and state levels.

The tariff war, launched by the world’s most advanced and powerful economy—militarily and economically—dominated discussions. Leaders from the European Union and emerging economies expressed concern over disruptions to global trade and supply chains. Participants from Asia, Europe, Latin America, and Africa returned home with the realization that greater emphasis must now be placed on non–US centric trade frameworks.